Monday, May 31, 2010
Spain's Inditex opens first Zara store in India
MADRID: Spain's Inditex, Europe's largest clothing retailer, said that it had opened the first store of its flagship Zara brand in India as part of its push into the fast-growing Asian market.
The inauguration of the 1,800-square-metre (19,375 square feet) outlet in a shopping mall in the capital Delhi on Saturday will be followed by the opening of another Zara outlet in Mumbai and another in Delhi within weeks, it said.
"The country has a dozen cities whose populations each exceed three million people and the Indian market promises substantial growth potential for Zara's fashion offering," Inditex said in a statement.
The company plans to open a total of five Zara branches in India, the world's second most populous country with 1.1 billion people, this year as part of a joint venture with Indian conglomerate Tata Group.
Investment bank Goldman Sachs predicts India will expand annually by some 6.2 per cent from 2011 to 2050.
The country will overtake Germany as the world's fifth-biggest consumer market by 2025 as the size of its middle class expands to 583 million people, or about 41 per cent of the population, from about 50 million, or roughly five per cent currently, according to global consultancy firm McKinsey.
Many members of India's rising middle class are already familiar with Zara's stylish designs which resemble those of the big-name Italian fashion houses and are sold at moderate prices.
The company will target the upper middle class in India and its prices will be about 10 per cent higher than in Europe.
The foray into India is part of the company's aggressive expansion into Asia and its efforts to reduce its dependence on Western Europe which has suffered from weak economic growth in recent years.
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/services/retailing/Spains-Inditex-opens-first-Zara-store-in-India/articleshow/5996948.cms
Friday, May 28, 2010
Habits are at first cobwebs, then cables - Spanish Proverb
There were methods like Kaizen and others, implemented in organizations at a huge cost and with the single motive of enhancing productivity. But it is very difficult to change human nature.
Bad habits, no wonder, are still common on both the professional and personal front. It is a different matter that while some habits are more obvious than others, they may not be too detrimental. However, employees caught in the act may suffer the consequence of getting a bad reputation, which may also not be good for one’s career.
Given below are some work habits which reduce and hamper productivity, and which one should always try to break:
1) Improper planning:
When it comes to work, most people don’t have their agenda in place for the day, week or month. There are no set goals on what they want to achieve. They simply reach their workplace and then decide on the work to be executed.“Lack of planning of the day at work or at the job is one of the most ‘non-productive’ habits at the workplace. This can, however, be rectified by a simple basic discipline of starting the day with some basic agenda in place.
2) Carrying a chip on the shoulder:
When you feel that you are more superior to others and as a result of this, don’t give an ear to others’ thoughts, ideas and work and don’t feel the importance of including others in your work because of the feeling of greatness, you are doing more harm to yourself than to anyone else.
3) Not making notes/ filing information:
A large amount of time is wasted at the work place as well as in normal life as we don’t maintain notes or records. Most of the young people in the corporate world do not make notes of conversations they had with clients or peers.Then it becomes Most of the time like a Chinese whisper game.And hence a large amount of time goes waste in trying to retrieve information.
4) Mail game:
A large chunk of people seem to be using mails to determine the work they need to do and is also following ‘if the inbox is empty, the work is done’ kind of philosophy. Experts point out that mails are to be treated as facilitators to the work we do, not the work we need to do.
5) Not being a team player:
Just being intelligent and good at your tasks is hardly good enough to make a difference or grow in an organization. One need to be be a good teal player...one cannot be uncooperative.
6) Not adapting to the office culture:
Sometimes some employees find themselves unable to adjust to the working environment and start working the way they wish and without any proper order or mechanism. However, not being able to adapt to the culture of the workplace in turn brings dissatisfaction to everyone – including the employer, employees and others.
7) Lack of punctuality:
Tardiness is widely regarded as an HR problem.In a professional work environment, reaching late to office and even in interdepartmental meetings can cause enough damage to one’s career. A big irritant to many, this also impacts productivity.
8) Improper time management
A poor time management skill is a habit that needs to be worked upon if one is looking up to rise up the ladder.
9) Loose talk:
The only way to grow up the ranks is performance and good honest talk. Gossip mongering and loose talk doesn’t help.
10) No sense of responsibility/ownership:
When a person shuns away from his work and doesn’t feel responsible for his/her activities or refuses to take ownership of his acts and failures, this may hamper one’s growth in the long run.
Few tips for saving time
=>If you're always searching for a pen, stock one in every pocketbook, and put one in your checkbook.
=>Keep scissors in every room — that way, you won't waste time trying to find them if you have to open a package, cut a tag, or quickly wrap a gift.
=>When you find a useful number in the phone book, highlight it so it'll pop out the next time.
=>Reserve books online instead of driving over to the library to do it in person. (You can renew books online too.)
=>Keep note cards, envelopes, and stamps in a zip-top plastic bag in your purse so you can dash off a thank-you note while you're standing in line or waiting in the parking lot.
=>Before you leave home for a scheduled flight, print out your boarding passes from your airline's Website.
=>Avoid movie lines. Buy tickets ahead of time online.
=>Do all your banking online. (But only if u know how to use it safely.)
=>Wear a cordless headset when you're on the phone so you can multitask.
As Nestle Finds, Sustainability Cuts Many Ways
http://www.thegreensupplychain.com/NEWS/10-05-26-1.PHP?CID=3487
Corner Bata store a passe
Air cargo supply chain faces tough test as screening deadline nears
GST will turn supply chain tax-neutral - Business Standard
Knowing GST V: GST will turn supply chain tax-neutral |
Currently, distortions in supply chain are synonymous with complexities
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) would call for a fundamental redesign of the supply chain structures to make these simpler and more efficient. At present, the distortions in supply chain are synonymous with complexities such as area-based exemptions, factory-gate price for the levy of Cenvat, tax barriers to inter-state trade and multiple levies at various levels, including the central sales tax, octroi, purchase tax and stamp duty. No credit is allowed for many of these levies, which leads to significant cascading of taxes. As a result, the decisions of the organisations about inventory and distribution management are guided more by tax considerations than operational efficiency. Here are a few examples:
GST aims to rationalise and simplify the consumption tax structure at both Centre and state levels. It is expected to replace almost all indirect taxes, eliminate exemptions, do away with the current multiple layers of taxation and follow the principle of destination, instead of origin. The greatest virtue of GST is that it would make the supply chain tax-neutral. The final tax on a product would be the same, irrespective of the structure or location of its production, procurement of inputs, and the nature and complexity of the distribution chain. GST is charged on each transaction in the supply chain, with registered businesses receiving a credit for GST paid on purchases. The smooth flow of input tax credit provides the element of tax neutrality. For maintaining this neutrality, it would be important that no exemptions are provided (especially for business-to-business transactions) and full credit is made available for the tax paid on inputs in B2B transactions without any blockages to avoid cascading of tax. |
Monday, May 24, 2010
Retailers See Supply Chain Challenges in India
Staying Green in Tough Economic Times
Companies are aware of the issue, but many still lack detailed programs for tracing and calculating their carbon footprints over the extended supply chain, according to Luka Powanga, executive director of the Global Commerce Forum.
WalMart takes Control of Inbound Transportation
WalMart takes Control of Inbound Transportation – and its Vendors are Wary; Really a Pre-emptive Move over Fuel Surcharges? (Source:SCDigest) Beyond Dynamic Inbound Routing, WalMart will bring its Trucks to Vendor Docks; How much Leverage will be Lost?
WalMart has created quite a stir in its vendor community as it moves forwards with plans to take over inbound transportation management for most vendor shipments to its distribution centers and stores.
Currently, nearly all vendor shipments to WalMart are managed by the vendor, in some cases as part of a “total delivered price,” in other cases under a “Collect” arrangement where WalMart selects the carrier and pays for the freight, but the vendor works with the designated carrier to execute the shipment.
In other cases, Wal-Mart does arrange backhaul pick-ups at vendors after one of its trucks makes a delivery to its DCs or stores, but these are thought to represent a small portion of the total inbound moves.
A growing number of retailers manage inbound freight dynamically, requiring suppliers to submit planned shipments receiving routing instructions back from the retailer – but usually using common carriers for the freight movements to the retail DC.
Under its program, WalMart will largely use its fleet of some 6500 trucks to plan and execute the inbound vendor moves. While details are not completely clear, it is assumed many current Collect freight vendors will increasingly have their pick-ups scheduled by WalMart, and many Prepaid customers will now have WalMart completely control their outbound transportation.
Of course, this brings up the question of how the transition will be made for those customers currently selling to WalMart on a total delivered price that includes transportation to WalMart DCs.
In that case, WalMart will ask for “allowances,” as it does currently when it arranges a backhaul, to offset the transportation cost of the total delivered price. Those allowances become deductions against the invoice for that shipment.
According to BusinessWeek, in some cases WalMart has been asking for allowances in the range of 6% of the invoice – as much as twice as large as the actual cost for transportation, meaning the vendor’s current profit margin would be reduced by 3 percentage points – quite a financial beating.
“There may be a disconnect when we walk into the room on what that cost might be,” Kelly Abney, WalMart’s vice president of corporate transportation, recently told BusinessWeek magazine. “But we work collaboratively. As soon as a supplier shares the data, almost always those differences are quickly resolved.”
A former logistics executive at a major food company said that for large companies, transportation costs for WalMart shipments were under its overall average of 3%.
“The truckload costs for the larger accounts, certainly including WalMart, was more effective than our average,” he said. “6% cost allowance requests, if this is accurate, is dreaming.”
Impact on Current Volumes
For WalMart vendors that use total delivered pricing, one potential impact will be that they will lose some current transportation advantages.
With WalMart representing 20-30% of many vendors’ total sales volumes, losing the ability to leverage those volumes if they move from prepaid and add to WalMart pick-up could result in higher rates on its other shipments due to a loss in total freight they can offer to truckers. In other cases, vendors may lose the some optimization capability, such as multi-stop truckload optimization, or continuous moves, that are no longer viable with Wal-Mart controlling those shipments.
“It’s the large consumer packaged goods manufacturers that tend to ship Walmart Prepaid and who are the ones at risk to lose leverage with this change,” one vice president of logistics for a WalMart vendor told SCDigest. He, like virtually everyone we spoke with for this article, spoke only on the condition of anonymity.
In the end, WalMart is saying it is simply better in logistics than its suppliers – which may be true given its huge number of trucks and total network density, providing opportunities to reduce empty miles that are simply not available to most companies.
The new program has “allowed our suppliers to focus on what they do best, manufacturing products for us,” Abney said last week. “With lower costs usually comes increased sales.”
Abney said Wal-Mart has had such discussions with more than 100 of its thousands of vendors thus far, and some few dozen have already had their shipment approaches change to WalMart control.
Another factor of concern to vendors is the potential for greater distribution center costs.
“Customer pick-ups [CPUs] are the no good for our DC because they are frequently late, not willing to drop trailers, which causes live loading, cause OS&D issues, etc.,” one logistics executive told us. “Remember that most of the customer pick-ups will be carriers they secure to do the pick-up rather than their own fleet. We do everything possible to limit CPUs and live loading as it added significant cost to our supply chain.”
Role of Fuel Surcharges
Do fuel surcharges play a role in WalMart’s new strategy?
According to the direct director of transportation for another WalMart supplier, WalMart’s challenges with fuel surcharges under the current program are key to this change in transportation strategy.
“What is interesting - and distressing at the same time- is that WalMart is considering changing our terms to Prepaid but force us to use only their fleet. Why would they do that? A Collect item has no transportation cost in the price of the goods,” our source said. “What they want us to do is to agree upon a transportation cost and add it to the cost of the goods but provide a freight allowance at the same amount for freight. You would think this would have a net effect of zero.”
But it doesn’t, he said.
“What they are truly trying to get at is to recover fuel surcharges more accurately. The problem WalMart was having is that Collect pricing is very slow to change, maybe once a year, and so often they were left holding the bag on increased fuel prices with no mechanism to recover,” the executive said. “But with this approach, they can simply enact a fuel surcharge program with their freight allowance and now they are whole – closing a loophole of the benefits of Collect freight terms.”
It seems clear to us that the move is of far more benefit to WalMart than its suppliers – but when you are the customer, especially one the size of WalMart, you get to call the shots.
An interesting question is whether the changes will have enough of an impact on consumer goods manufacturer profits to get the attention of Wall Street analysts.
What is your reaction to the new WalMart program to take control of almost all its inbound transportation? What do you see as the impact on its suppliers’ supply chain costs? Is there a better way?
| |||||
Monday, May 17, 2010
Ash In The Supply Chain
Paul A. Laudicina, chairman of management consulting firm A.T. Kearney, says in this guest post that the ash from Iceland's volcano is one more reason that global supply disruption is a top-of-mind issue for managers of global corporations.
Whirlpool Spins Flexibility and Agility into Its Supply Chain
Friday, May 14, 2010
Dematic Debuts LaserTrucks+; Launches Parts-Purchasing Website
Offshoring to Mexico? Look before you leap
When they think about relocating offshore operations to Mexico, most companies focus on the supply chain benefits. What they should be looking at are the challenges.
Thursday, May 13, 2010
Friday, May 7, 2010
B the CEO of ur life!!!
ONE of the most precious gifts we can give ourselves and to each other is a sense of empowerment. A sense of power over yourself and immediate surroundings. Imagine what a wonderful feeling that would give you. To wake up rejuvenated each morning and feel on top of the world because you are in control of your day and whatever happens to you. There is a unique joy and celebration in that! Real happiness can come only from within. When you wake up each morning, consider if you really want to be doing what you are scheduled to do that day. If the answer is ‘no' more often than ‘yes', there is something obviously very wrong somewhere. You are not celebrating yourself or the gift of life enough. Ask, are you at peace within? Have you resolved the inherent conflict in all of us, the constant struggle between the baser and higher consciousness? Once you strike a balance within, it is easier to transfer that feeling of peace to your life as well. When the joy of doing what you want to do suffuses your life, you will feel an extra bounce in your step and a keener power of observation, a deeper understanding of what's within and what surrounds you. It is then that you will question all that you have accepted blindly so far. You will question prevailing wisdom, bust old paradigms,challenge social conventions and assumptions. You will learn to believe in yourself and develop your own perspective on life. You will assert your own sovereignty. Your life will be filled with love, bliss, light, inspiration and positivity. You will learn to do the unexpected, to think big, think lateral, think mosaic! Let us together move towards higher levels of fearlessness and creativity. Let us look at life more for opportunities than constraints. Let us keep shedding limitations and keep raising the bar. Each one of us can be the CEO of his or her own life!
Thursday, May 6, 2010
MNCs in Rural India - Good article (WSJ)
A "symbiotic relationship" is how Sanjeev Chadha, chairman and CEO of PepsiCo India, describes the work that the food and beverage multinational undertakes with thousands of farmers across India. "We help them with progressive farming techniques and they are of huge benefit to us in securing a reliable supply chain," he says. Some observers would call what Pepsi is doing corporate social responsibility (CSR); others more cynically might say it's simply another example of multinational corporations (MNCs) trying to figure out how to make inroads in India's challenging, but potentially lucrative rural market.
Whatever the words used by executives like Chadha for such initiatives, it is impossible to discuss multinational strategies in rural India without mentioning CSR. In its various forms, it is a critical part of their rural growth plans, often out of sheer necessity. Filling the gaps left by government, MNCs have built roads in rural India that help them deliver their goods, provided education and health care for communities whose workforces they rely upon, and implemented environmental programs to protect precious natural resources needed to keep supply chains running smoothly.
"In some cases, I am sure CSR activities are mostly rhetoric," says Harbir Singh, Wharton management professor and co-author of a new book titled, The India Way: How India's Top Business Leaders Are Revolutionizing Management. "But CSR is more legitimate in India than in the U.S., where infrastructure has been built and government is seen as addressing societal development agendas."
File photo of a villager drinking a soda in Madhuranthagam village, some 75 kms south of Madras, April 23, 2004. AFP/Getty Images
Yet now there's a shift in how MNCs look at their entire rural India investments beyond CSR. With growth drying up in developed markets and their center of gravity shifting to emerging markets, MNC businesses in India are under pressure to prove that their rural strategies aren't just about doing well from a CSR perspective. They also need to show head office that these strategies are doing well from a business perspective. In short, the strategies must start delivering top- and bottom-line results.
After years of false starts, missed opportunities and flawed strategies, a number of MNCs' India businesses are getting close. Others already are there and are ramping up their rural investments. None can take that fine balance between doing good and doing business for granted, as Nokia, Coca-Cola and Max New York Life -- among the companies profiled in this special report -- show. And it's for that reason that at PepsiCo India, "our rural agenda has been driven by purpose and now is moving into performance," says Chadha.
Spending Power
For many MNCs, there's a lot more riding on their rural India performance than there once was as India's growth story spreads to the heartland. Two-thirds of the country's one billion consumers live in rural India, where almost half of the national income is generated. A report by Technopak Consultants and the Confederation of Indian Industries, a trade body, estimates that the country's rural consumer market generated US$425 billion of revenue, up from US$266 billion the previous year.
The big reason for the growth is that India's rural consumers are steadily gaining more spending power. The number of rural households earning less than US$760 a year is down from 65% to 24% since 1993, while those with an income of US$1,525 have more than doubled from 22% to 46%. Combine these factors with improved roads and other infrastructure in rural India to help products reach their markets, and it's easy to see rural India's attraction.
Special Report
The Wall Street Journal and India Knowledge@Wharton present a special report on Multinational Corporations and Rural India. This reader resource combines specially-commissioned material with recent articles and more from our archives. Click here to read all.
"We are finally beginning to see that rural India has cash and is able to spend at the same time," says Vijay Govindarajan, professor of international business at Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College in New Hampshire, who is also the chief innovation consultant for General Electric. "This is a remarkable combination for companies."
But any company coming to India for the first time that thinks it will be easy to take advantage of that combination is mistaken. Rural India is hugely complex, not least because of its diverse pace of development. As a recent study from IMRB International, a research company in Mumbai, notes, some markets are big but not as affluent as other markets (Uttar, Bihar Pradesh) while some are affluent but not very large (Himachal Pradesh, Goa). Experts also say that strategies need to take into account the vast number of languages and cultural differences across India's hinterland, while keeping strategies highly flexible and adaptable.
It can mean developing products and services tailored specifically to the rural market. When LG entered India in the mid-1990s, numerous brands were vying for shelf space with hardly anything to distinguish them from competitors. The South Korean company developed two color television sets for the rural market, Sampoorna (which means "complete" in Hindi) and Cine Plus. At US$65 and US$107 respectively, the sets were priced slightly higher than the black-and-white televisions that other manufacturers were selling in rural markets and that had become obsolete in urban homes. LG was also the first to offer gaming with its cut-price TVs and menus in English and Hindi. Now LG has refrigerators, washing machines and microwave ovens targeted at price-sensitive consumers sold from hundreds of retail and distributor outlets across the hinterland, with rural markets contributing 40% of its revenue.
Much also depends on the sector and products sold. In fast-moving consumer goods, for example, MNC products are capturing a sizable portion of rural consumer spending in a number of areas, with year-on-year increases in rural spending in 2009 on MNC shampoos (70%), washing powder (60%) and toothpaste (112%), say researchers at IMRB. What's more, they say, the average spending on these products is growing faster in rural than in urban markets.
Soap Operas
In the course of ramping up the performance of their rural strategies, MNCs are applying the lessons already learned. One of those lessons is that the benefits of a first-mover advantage are tough to hang on to as rural Indian consumers' tastes change rapidly, with questionable brand loyalty.
That applies even to a groundbreaker like Hindustan Unilever Ltd. (HUL), the country's largest consumer-products company owned by Anglo-Dutch Unilever. It made waves in the hinterland in 2001 when its Shakti Project enlisted self-help groups to develop a network of women -- largely from very low-income households -- into entrepreneurs, selling baskets of HUL products door to door. Today, 42,000 women earn a living by selling HUL products in more than 100,000 villages in 15 states. "India's rural narrative has been defined by HUL," notes Pradeep Lokhande, founder of Rural Relations, a Pune-based consumer-relationship management organization.
In the meantime, HUL has embraced other novel distribution strategies, such as selling products like its Sunsilk and Clinic shampoos in small, inexpensive packets for low-income Indians in the hinterland with little spare cash. Thanks to those efforts, the company has one of the most extensive distribution networks in the country, with 6.3 million retail outlets, including one million that it services directly. Rural India currently accounts for nearly half of HUL's revenue.
But HUL's lead regularly comes under threat. In December, for example, rival MNC Procter & Gamble launched Tide Naturals, which is a 30% cheaper version of its Tide detergent targeted at rural consumers -- a global first for the Cincinnati-based MNC. The launch was part of the parent company's "purpose-inspired growth strategy" to "touch and improve more consumers' lives in more parts of the world." Within weeks of its launch, Tide Naturals shook up India's US$8 billion detergent market by clinching a 0.6% share of the market, according to AC Nielsen.
HUL's response has been to turn to a local court to contest P&G's use of the word "naturals" to promote its new product. With neither side backing down, the case continues.
While other MNCs aren't necessarily going to be airing their competitive grievances in court, they can expect fast, nimble competitors to take them by surprise and grab market share if they don't stay close to their customers -- which is no small feat in a country like India, which has 642,000 villages, some with populations as low as 500.
'Uncharted Water'
Nowhere is that more evident than in mobile telephony. Mobile phone penetration in India jumped from 1.4 units per 100 people in 1995 to 51 units currently. In the 12 months to September 2009, the number of mobile subscribers increased 55% to 142 million, according to the Telecommunications Regulatory Authority of India.
Taking a lead in that growth has been Nokia, the US$55 billion Finnish mobile handset maker, which is one of the companies profiled in this special report. As part of a global emerging market focus since 2006, rural India now accounts for 40% of Nokia India's US$5 billion annual revenue. But it's a crowded business to be in. Along with Samsung, LG, Sony Ericsson and Motorola, there are a number of handset makers not only from China selling cut-price handsets, but also from India's home-grown companies that are chipping away at Nokia's market share lead with hand sets that are cheaper, more practical or both.
Now Nokia, like other handset makers, is branching out and forging alliances with various partners to offer mobile banking and other services along with its handsets. "It's uncharted water" -- as Gerald Faulhaber, a business and public policy professor at Wharton, puts it -- one in which "customers are pushing the companies and taking them out of the comfort zone."
Doing so successfully requires one thing: "listen to people," states Karishma Kiri, a Seattle-based strategy and product management consultant at The K2 Group, who was a director of Microsoft's Unlimited Potential initiative which provides computers, software and IT training in emerging markets. "A lot of companies tend not to listen to [what] rural consumers say they need."
That's not as clear-cut as MNCs might think. The jury is still out on the mobile services launched by news agency Reuters last year and other service providers to deliver agriculture information to farmers' mobile phone. According to Rural Relations' Lokhande, the demand hasn't been strong. "There's a perception mismatch between the farmers and the service provider," he notes. While the companies assert that the service is useful, affordable and personalized, many farmers figure they can get daily rates from their state agriculture marketing boards for two cents, or half the price.
In rural areas, finding the magic price points that don't eat into margins yet boost volume is an ongoing battle, with a lot hinging on distribution. "We have to build, and are building much deeper 'go-to-market' systems in rural India. They have to be extremely cost-efficient, much more so than they are in the urban areas," says PepsiCo's Chadha.
The US$43.2 billion MNC has been in India for more than 20 years and now claims to have overtaken Nestle as the top food and beverage company in the country. Overall, India has indeed been treating the company well, even during the downturn. India revenue at its drinks business grew 40% last year, while volume jumped 32%, well outpacing most other countries in PepsiCo's portfolio.
But it's not resting easy. Last year, it invested US$200 million -- the most ever in any single year -- as part of a US$500 million plan to expand its distribution infrastructure, while increasing R&D and adding four new plants to the 45 it already has in the country.
To make those investments pay off, rural India -- which currently accounts for 20% of PepsiCo India's business -- is taking center stage. "Over the next 10 years, I see rural India forming 40% to 50% of our national business, and in the future, growth will be powered by the rural areas," says Chadha.
Is that a long time to wait? "If any company wants [quick] financial results from the rural initiative, it is seriously mistaken," says Tuck's Govindarajan. "You have to look at the next decade and not the next quarter."
K2 Group's Kiri agrees. "The rural incubation work of multinationals is part of their business," she says. "But they need to be less focused on [year-on-year] success and spend more energy on building innovative solutions and business models for this segment. It's a long haul.
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
Ministry tightens noose on retailers
The corporate affairs ministry is tightening the noose around retail companies a sector which has been left largely untracked due to the absence of a designated sectoral regulator.
According to government sources, distressed retail company Subhiksha Trading Services has committed multiple violations of the Companies Act, 1956, for which the penalties can be anywhere from imprisonment of up to two years to fine up to Rs 2 lakh and above.
The list of company law violations by the company is endless. These include sections 209, 292, 210, 211, 215, 193 and 628 that deal with maintaining balance sheets and profit and loss account, compiling minutes of the proceedings of the general meeting and authentication of balance sheets and profit and loss accounts by directors of the company.
The findings compiled by Registrar of Companies (RoC) Madras will be sent to minister of corporate affairs Salman Khurshid. The RoC is expected to initiate proceedings to nail the company officials. The case, however, is already pending with the Madras High Court that has imposed a stay order for one month.
Meanwhile, the corporate affairs ministry has also directed RoC to look into books of accounts of another retail giant - Vishal Retail.
"Prima-facie, we have evidence of account manipulation by the company. So we have directed RoC to look into the matter under section 209 of the Act," a government source said.
Following the closure of 1,600 retail units of Subhiksha, a petition was filed in the Madras High Court against the company. The petition was filed by one of the company's lenders Kotak Mahindra Bank (KOTAKBANK.NS : 740.95 -5.5), which wanted to recover its dues amounting to Rs 40 crore.
Subhiksha's second-largest stakeholder, ICICI (ICICIBANK.NS : 899.75 -3.9) Venture Funds Management Co Ltd, has alleged in the past that the management of the retail company had denied other stakeholders, access to the financial details of the company.
The company's debt burden is around Rs 750 crore and is seeking cash infusion of around Rs 300 crore to restart its business. The company is looking to restructure its debts in a phased manner. A text message sent to R Subramanian, managing director of Subhiksha Trading Services went unanswered.
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
From NBC: ‘The Office’ Meets ‘Slumdog Millionaire’
When it comes to television comedy involving Indians, the British usually do it first and do it better than the Americans.
British television execs seem to be more optimistic that audiences there will like oddball ideas – in fact the odder the better – and because of longstanding cultural ties and the large population of Indians and Pakistanis in Britain, they’ve even been open to oddball ideas from them. And it can’t hurt to have funding from fees that are mandatory for all television owners.
Which is why it was possible for a comedy sketch show like BBC’s “Goodness Gracious Me,” full of insider jokes about Indian culture (though they did poke fun at the English too), to become a mainstream hit in Britain in the late ’90s. The show’s title was a nod to the many English turns-of-phrase that Indians have kept in circulation long past their sell-by date.
Anyone remember Indian Bridegroom Detective? When there’s a problem to be dealt with, he goes into a phonebooth and comes out in full wedding regalia complete with strands of flowers falling from his turban over his eyes, before galloping off on a white horse. Another character always insisted that everything good in the world comes from India. If pressed hard, most Indians would admit to knowing at least one person in real life like that:
Two of the show’s actors, Meera Syal and Sanjeev Bhaskar, went on to create another extremely popular show out of a set of characters from “Goodness Gracious Me”: “The Kumars at No. 42,” first broadcast in 2001.
Now the United States is thinking about bringing the Indian call center to mainstream television audiences in America, according to this report by the Wall Street Journal’s Amy Chozick. NBC executives are working on a pilot for a show called “Outsourced,” described as “The Office” meets “Slumdog Millionaire.” It stars Broadway actor Ben Rappaport and a mostly Indian cast.
NBC might want to look at how ITV’s “Mumbai Calling” (British, again) played out. Set in a Mumbai call center called Teknobable, it starred the ubiquitous Mr. Bhaskar and Nitin Ganatra, who had a bit role (but a funny one) as the Indian version of Mr. Collins in the so-bad-it’s-hilarious 2004 film “Bride and Prejudice.” The British Comedy Guide said the 2007 pilot had promise but the full show was very different and did not do well. If the call center comedy doesn’t work for an audience that joyfully embraced the Kumars, it’s not likely the U.S. can do much better.
The U.S. tried to bring the “Kumars at No. 42″ to America but not with an Indian family. Instead it featured an ethnic group that occupies the sort of place in America that Indians and Pakistanis do in Britain. We’re guessing “The Ortegas” were Mexican from this report at Latino Standup, which says the show never actually aired. Maybe it was for the best. Remember the American version of “Men Behaving Badly”?
It’s not that America can’t do humor – Jon Stewart and the fake news contingent are proof of that. But good ethnic humor, not so much. As for Indians doing humor about Indians, we’ve heard that’s still a work in progress too. Or at least that’s what Indian stand-up comedians say.
The Slum Dog and the Millionaire
What makes contrasts in India so gripping is that they are on such a monumental scale.
A pair of costly designer shoes adorns a well-to-do person’s feet next to someone walking barefoot in the scorching heat; a private gated community with manicured lawns is situated next to a shanty dwelling that serves it; or expensive meals created by celebrity chefs are enjoyed at fancy restaurants while yet another farmer commits suicide because he is unable to cover his debts.
Very often these experiences take place within moments, and meters, of each other. Unlike in China, where the poor in general are kept away from city centers and live under the watchful eye of an authoritarian state, in India they often co-exist, pressed against each other, cheek by jowl. This is contemporary India: the concurrence of wealth and abject poverty.
In contrast to the West, this distinction stands out much more starkly in India because of the extremes between the situations. While India’s growth races forward, the ones left behind are very much visible in the rear view mirror. With apologies to the Oscar-winning movie, it is a case of “slumdog” and “millionaire.”
Widening income inequality in this country is very much a part of its growth story, as it has been in all rapidly growing economies throughout history. The old cliché that it’s because the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer is not the true story.
While the rich are getting richer, the poor are getting richer too, but not as fast, so the gap continues to widen. It is worthwhile mentioning economist Simon Kuznets, after whom the famous “Kuznets curve” is named. This postulates that income inequality is low in poor countries, rises with income as economic development proceeds apace, comes to a peak, and finally begins to fall as income rises yet further.
The most widely used measure of income inequality is the Gini coefficient, a number ranging from zero to one, where zero denotes perfect equality and one perfect inequality. According to UN estimates, the Gini coefficient in India is approximately 0.36. By contrast, China’s is 0.47, Brazil’s is 0.61, and Russia’s is 0.40. The average in rich countries is around 0.30 or so.
While these numbers might suggest India is a more equitable society, we should actually expect inequality in India to rise as rapid economic growth rates lead to a catch-up in levels of economic development with the other fast-growing emerging economies. It is only when India becomes a richer and more mature economy, many years in the future, when the full fruits of the so-called “trickle-down effect” — the notion that prosperity will reach people at the bottom of the economic pyramid — will be realized. As of today, 450 million people in India live below the poverty line, without sufficient access to food, health, and education.
This narrative in India has parallels in other major emerging market countries, most notably Brazil and South Africa, both democracies like India. In both of these countries, inequality has fuelled social strife, including a large increase in violent crimes such as murder, robbery, car-jacking, and drug-related crimes in the major cities. Rich residents of Sao Paolo or Johannesburg rely on private security to keep them safe, and sometimes even this is not enough.
This begs the question: is this what the future holds in store for India? What I have in mind here is not just an increase in crime but the possibility that ever-widening disparities have the potential to destabilize the very fabric of Indian society. While many Indians might consider this far-fetched, let us not forget the Maoist insurgency.
Many observers, including Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, cite the Maoist threat as the nation’s most serious internal security challenge. The Maoist guerrillas’ most recent attack was on a convoy in Chattisgarh in which they killed 76 paramilitary policemen, making it one of the worst attacks since the start of the insurgency in the eastern hinterland of the country. The uprising is widely blamed on social deprivation and the low level of economic development in this region.
There is a body of economic research that attempts to correlate inequality with social ills such as crime and corruption, accounting for other factors such as the level of economic development. While such studies are never conclusive, they provide some evidence of a positive relationship: in other words, where inequality is higher and other things are equal, there is a greater incidence of social ills. As any economist will tell you, correlation does not imply causation; but this macroeconomic evidence is at the very least suggestive.
The evidence from economics and from other emerging economies seems to suggest the likelihood of increasing inequality and therefore worsening social tensions as the Indian economy continues to grow. It is small comfort to know that, according to Kuznets, these problems will eventually disappear when we finally become a mature economy. But in the intervening years, until that happens, we ignore this threat at our peril.